Selecting and Using Mathematics Methods Texts: Nontrivial Tasks

Shelly Sheats Harkness, Amber Brass

Abstract


Mathematics methods textbooks/texts are important components of many courses for preservice teachers.  How these texts are selected and used should be explored.  Within this paper we report the findings of a survey administered electronically to 132 members of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE) in order to answer the following research questions:  What criteria do mathematics teacher educators use when they select texts?  How do they use the texts in their methods courses?  What strategies (literacy strategies, reflection strategies, etc.) do mathematics teacher educators use in order to help preservice teacher engage with the texts?  Findings suggest that mathematics teacher educators use varied criteria to select methods texts and they use texts in a variety of ways.  Some use texts to show and tell about standards-based practices and some want to help preservice teachers use texts to shape their own visions of standards-based practices.  This suggests a view of “literacy as a lens” (Draper, 2008) for shaping preservice teachers’ visions of teaching and learning and/or helping them shape their own visions for teaching and learning.  Additionally, results indicate that mathematics teacher educators ask preservice teachers to participate in conversations about the texts they select and use in their courses.  We propose additional research related to the literacy strategies that mathematics teacher educators use in their methods courses in order to help preservice teacher engage with the texts that they select and use.


Keywords


mathematics methods texts; literacy strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arbaugh, F. (2014). Summer professional reading list. Connections, 23(4), 1-2.

Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2014) About AMTE. Retrieved from

http://amte.net/about.

Barton, M. L., & Heidema, C. (2002). Teaching reading in mathematics (2nd ed.). Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

Bean, T. W. (1997). Preservice teachers’ selection and use of content area literacy strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(3), 154-163.

Borasi, R. (1991). Learning mathematics through inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research (4th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Draper, R. J. (2008). Redefining content-are literacy teacher education: Finding my voice through collaboration. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 60-81.

Draper, R. J. (2002). Every teacher a literacy teacher? An analysis of the literacy-related messages in secondary methods textbooks. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 358-384.

Draper, R. J., & Siebert, D. (2004). Different goals, similar practices: Making sense of the mathematics and literacy instruction in a standards-based mathematics classroom.

American Educational Research Journal 41(4), 927-962.

Fisher, D., & Ivey, G. (2005). Literacy and language as learning in content-area classes: A departure from “every teacher a teacher of reading.” Action in Teacher Education, 277(2), 3-11.

Kidd, M. (2008). A comparison of secondary methods courses in California. In California Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators Monograph 1, M. Lutz (Ed.), pp. 1-5).

Manzo, A. V., Manzo, U. C., & Estes, T. H. (2001). Content area literacy: Interactive teaching for interactive learning (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

McCrory, R., & Stylianides, A. J. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving in mathematics textbooks for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 119-131.

Mesa, V., & Griffiths, B. (2012). Textbook mediation of teaching: an example from tertiary mathematics instructors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 85-107.

Phillips, D. C. K., Bardsley, M. E., Bach, T., & Gibb-Brown, K. (2009). “But I teach math!” The journey of middle school mathematics teachers and literacy coaches learning to integrate literacy strategies into the math instruction. Education, 129(3), 467-472.

Smitherman, S. E. (2006). Reflections on teaching a mathematics methods education course. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.

Taylor, P. M., & Ronau, R. (2006). Syllabus study: A structured look at mathematics methods courses. Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators Connections.

Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. A. L. (2002). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Weinberg, A., & Wiesner, E. (2011). Understanding mathematics textbooks through reader-oriented theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 49-63.

Weinberg, A., Wiesner, E., Benesh, B., & Boester, T. (2012). Undergraduate students’ self-reported use of mathematics textbooks. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 22(2), 152-175


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.